AIDS is curable          СПИД излечим 

AIDS.

The first World swindle.

Two swindlers who shook the World! 

 

The AIDS problem presented in this material is approached from a completely new perspective, entirely unknown to current medicine. All presented material is the result of private research and cannot be accessed by any expert from any other source. Therefore, a specialist can express his opinion exclusively after acquaintance with the given material and strictly based on the given information. Any opinion rejecting this material, referring to any other source, is a display of malevolent intentions fueled only by pride, envy and arrogance, the result of which is the continuing massive death of the ill.

 

Origin of Human's Immunodeficiency

The main cells supporting humoral defense mechanisms are leukocytes. Of all leukocytes present in the body of a modern person, B-­lymphocytes and their mature versions – dendrocytes – carry out a leading role in the implementation of humoral immunity through intricate mechanisms involving the formation and dissociation of the immune complexes. These cells with large nucleus can support rapid and intensive proliferation.

The protein molecules, once synthesized by B­-lymphocytes, are mostly fixed on the surface of the same B-­lymphocytes, and a small fraction is released into the bloodstream. They are known as antibodies and designated as immunoglobulins (Ig). As such, IgG, IgE, IgA, IgD and IgM are fixed on the superficial membrane of B­-lymphocytes. 

The mechanism of humoral immunity is carried out as follows: when an antigen which can be a component of various viruses, bacteria, parasites, fungi, or simply an allogenic substance enters the body, B­-lymphocytes surround it from all directions and bind to it through interaction with their surface antibodies. The agglomerate of B-­lymphocytes bound to destroy the antigen forms an immune complex. After a series of consecutive mechanisms, the antigen breaks down and its constituents are removed from the body.

Following antigen destruction, the immune complex is immediately disassembled, and the released B-­lymphocytes continue to perform their protective function. While circulating in the bloodstream, B-­lymphocytes repeat these actions each time an antigen is encountered. The greater the number of antigens penetrating into the body, the more intensive is the load on the immune system and particularly on the circulating B­-lymphocytes. Dissolution of the immune complexes is carried out by substances continuously synthesized and secreted into the bloodstream. If the synthesis of these substances is reduced or terminated, the disassembly process is partially or completely interrupted. The B­-lymphocytes that are unable to escape are completely neutralized and cannot perform further protective functions. The physiological process of humoral protection, which depends on the assembly and disassembly of these immune complexes, is impaired. While complex formation takes place as usual, the mandatory final process of their disassembly is prevented due to the absence of necessary factors. Consequently, the physiological immune complexes become pathological. The associated B-lymphocytes are maintained in a neutralized condition trapped within the network of each pathological immune complex, thus paralyzing the functions of the immune system. Depending on the intensity of pathocomplex formation, either a partial immunodeficiency such as in the case of systemic pathologies (rheumatism, systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic scleroderma), or a complete immunodeficiency as in the case of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). 

Beginning from the second half of the 18th century, once mankind takes a sharp turn towards urbanization and alienation from nature radical biological, adaptable and evolutionary changes emerge in the human body. Among them, the synthesis of the substances required for the disbandment of immune complexes in the last stage of humoral defenses, begins to decrease. Consequently, a rising fraction of the immune complexes starts to lose their ability to be disassociated and a growing number of B-lymphocytes are trapped in them. A fraction of immune complexes fails to disassociate and becomes pathological. Once trapped in the pathocomplex networks, B-lymphocytes lose the ability to perform their basic protective function. They lose their functionality and become completely neutralized. Over the years, as the proportion of neutralized B-lymphocytes increases, immunodeficiency emerges and progresses. On the other hand, the pathological immune complexes circulating in the bloodstream can associate with other blood cells and proteins to form giant aggregates (in terms of biology), which cause occlusion of the blood vessels and subsequent thrombotic infarction resulting in necrosis of surrounding tissues.

During their emergence, pathological immune complexes introduced new nosological forms, entirely unknown to mankind till that time. In other words, a whole group of human pathologies, grouped under the name of "pathocomplex process", arose as a result of humanity’s sharp turn towards urbanization and the emergence of biological, adaptable and evolutionary changes. 

The growing incidence of pathocomplex process, reaching its peak by the 1980s, results in a complete immune deficiency. Suddenly, a new condition for the human body appears and takes our humanity by surprise much like the onset of cardiovascular pathologies in the 1930s. 

More than 200 years have passed since the second half of the 18th century, when the human body first began its evolutionary reorganization till the 1980s. As a result of this long period, our humanity has reached a state of complete immune deficiency. Now, that the human body was virtually deprived of its immunity, it was vulnerable to the invasion of all kinds of pathogenic agents, from the weakest viruses, fungi and parasites to the most virulent bacteria, subsequently leading to virusemia, bacteriemia and sepsis.

This marks the beginning of a new era – an era of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Essentially, the peak evolution point of the pathocomplex process is primarily responsible for the manifestations of AIDS. 

At this moment, against the vagueness and fogginess of the mounting crisis, a motivated "scientist" named Robert Gallo suddenly appears at the nick of time and, without any effort, finds traces of a mysterious virus in the blood serum of a person suffering from a complete immune deficiency. Not reflecting on the consequences, Robert Gallo introduces confusion into the whole sequence of events by presenting this mysterious virus as the etiological factor of human immunodeficiency. 

The detection of antibodies specific to the virus in these particular circumstances is not necessarily an argument and evidence of the virus’ participation in the development process of complete immune deficiency. The presence of antibodies against any pathogenic agent, in the blood serum of a subject affected by the pathocomplex process at the peak of its evolution, is only an indicator and a consequence of pre­existing immunodeficiency. With his deed, Robert Gallo intentionally committed a forgery that initiated a chain of events that would shake humanity from the late 20th to the early 21th centuries.

In the case of human immunodeficiency, it doesn’t matter whether Robert Gallo truly found the antigens of a real virus, actually identified them and created the test system by immunization of laboratory animals with these antigens or followed the principle of the blood serum protein hydrolysis. It is only a question of a human conscience, his in particular, if it exists at all. Human immune deficiency existed and still exists. The real dispute is around its origin.

Simultaneously with Robert Gallo, the French Luc Montagnier, a friend who closely collaborated with him, claimed he detected viral traces that could be the etiological factors of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). With the aid of prostituting mass media, the whole world immersed into the vacuum of medical science readily accepted and implanted this statement.

It is in this atmosphere within the medical science vacuum that a competition for a Nobel Prize flared up between the French Luc Montagnier and his like­minded friend Robert Gallo – an American of Italian origin with whom he fondly communicated about his achievements. The feud between them reached its peak even before this new disease was identified as a separate nosological unit or the virus causing this disease described, even before the existence of the virus and even without enough statistical data to demonstrate the potential for an epidemic. Motivated solely by the thrill of winning a Nobel Prize, driven by personal ambition, these two "scientists" went so far that proving the etiological role of the isolated virus in human immunodeficiency was no longer important for them. To receive the Nobel Prize by all means necessary became their only purpose.

In May 1984, before the scientific evidence from the conducted "research" on detection of the factors causing the human immunodeficiency was ever received, using the data received from his friend Luc Montagnier, Robert Gallo hastily published his article in the Science   magazine, where the so­called virus was presented as the main etiological factor of AIDS. Despite the fact that no virus has been discovered yet, the whole world immersed in the information vacuum accepted this statement on a wide scale as the greatest discovery and sensation of the 20th century.

The biggest deceit of mankind instantly spread throughout the entire world as a scientific discovery. A new theory and a new disease under the name of AIDS emerged and yet another virus, the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) was invented as its etiological factor. Due to the element of surprise and the vacuum in medical world at that time, nobody could express an objective opinion. Statements about the detection of the new disease and the occurrence of a new theory explaining its etiology were based on the analysis of only 72 patients and in only 26 of them the antibodies against some fragments of a mysterious and to this day unidentified virus were discovered.

The competition for the Nobel Prize between the so­called American and French scientists continued. In deep sleep, the naive World, did not even suspect what was cooking for breakfast.

If Robert Gallo was destined to be awarded the Nobel Prize for his dishonesty and dishonorableness under action conditions, it would have been far better if he was offered it before he ever invented "HIV" back for his discovery of the so­called blood cancer virus so that, once satisfied, he would finally attain his well­deserved rest and leave the medical world without his future "creative" plans and ambitions. In any case, some other swindler would be awarded the Nobel Prize by the auction hammer in the future.

Angry and dissatisfied this time, Mr.Gallo quickly registered and patented everything that was yet unproved and most importantly, that was dishonestly accrued from Montagnier under his name.

The case reached the court when Luc Montagnier, the French doctor and Mr.Gallo’s friend, accused him of theft and appropriation of the exchanged information and registration of another’s achievements under his name. The US President Ronald Reagan urgently intervened into this flared up international scandal and negotiated with the French prime­minister Jacque Chirac about a mutually a dvantageous compromise for the settlement of dispute that created the uproar in the medical "scientific" world, quite distant to both politicians. On March 1987, during a ceremony held at the White House, they finally concluded a memorandum providing that all rights to sell the test systems for the ostensibly AIDS virus would belong to the US Ministry of Health and the France Pasteur Institute. The income from the sales of these test systems was to be proportionally divided between these establishments. The test systems for detection of the so­called HIV that according to their forecasts would spread across the globe like a lightning were to be sold under the exclusive patent of the Ministry of Health of America and the France Pasteur Institute.

Considering that the number of "HIV-­infected" people is constantly growing and officially reaching about 60 million and that twice more test systems would be necessary to detect them all, the sales of these reagents were predicted to generate astronomical revenue for the aforementioned establishments. Now, they understood that, as long as the theory of viral origin of AIDS remains afloat and funded, this quite promising business is capable of enlarging the budget of any country. To strengthen their positions, this theory needed to be associated with some public taboo, for example homosexuality. Very few people would dare to raise this theme without being labeled homosexual then. This is why the science of social psychology is needed and Pavlov came in handy even here.

This is precisely why these institutions are motivated to detect more people positive for "HIV". As long as nobody will dare to protest to such inhuman trade around this theory because of the artificial social problem and artificial taboo created around AIDS, their "business" will continue to prosper and they will continue to plunder our world with quiet souls.

 

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome is curable 

  

Hence, AIDS is not a viral infection. The birth of the popular theory stipulating a viral cause to AIDS is the result of skillful and artful binding of social homosexuality taboo with a human immunodeficiency of unknown origin, at the time – undoubtedly for the purpose of financial gain.

The Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome is the peak point of the pathocomplex process development, which in turn appeared as the result of biological, evolutionary and adaptable changes of the human body that gradually developed over the last two centuries, owing to the sharp changes in environment conditions and social lifestyle.

The so­called immunodeficiency virus tends to invade an individual already suffering from an immune deficiency as a result of the pathocomplex process. The detection of antibodies against this virus only serves a diagnostic purpose, as an indicator of the presence of pathocomplex immunodeficiency. Therefore, AIDS treatments should be mainly focused on the elimination of the pathocomplex process. Any medication against the so­called virus of AIDS would only fight off the consequences, and not the cause of the disease. To eradicate the virus, without treating the cause of the disease, would allow recurrent infections by the same virus.

The control of opportunistic infections taking place in the presence of immunodeficiency must be accompanied by a treatment addressing immune deficiency, i.e. to inhibit the pathocomplex process. Otherwise, as soon as the treatment with antiviral drugs and antibiotics is terminated, the immune system will fail to prevent future infections by the virus. These infections will relapse, but this time these viruses will exhibit tolerance for the drugs, complicating the condition of the patient to a deadlock.

AIDS, and many other human diseases currently considered incurable, are completely treatable. AIDS is no longer the problem that should concern our society and medical science. From this point on, all the mistakes that were made regarding AIDS are consequences of the ignorance of the historical path that led human biology to the peak point of the pathocomplex process. The molecular structure of the substances required to complete the last stage of humoral immunity have been discovered by us, and the application of these substances   as key components in our integrated treatment of AIDS patients completely cures this disease as immunodeficiency syndrome. The synthesis of these vital substances eventually restores following the course of AIDS treatment. Subsequently, a high­level immunity is independently facilitated by the organism’s potential over the course of entire lifetime. Eliminating the pathocomplex process makes the foundation of numerous human pathologies that are currently considered incurable disappear at one stroke as it once happened in medicine with the application of antibiotics.

To prove the effectiveness of our method, at the insistence of similar medical "luminaries", we carried out clinical trials on individuals infected with AIDS. The results of these treatments are shown below. Today, it is clear to us that nobody really needed our achievements. They were intentionally requested to delay and divert attention away from this simple solution. At the time, we naively thought that the results of our treatment would truly save millions of lives from the "plague of the 20th century", and that the problem of AIDS would be gone forever.

We would like to draw your attention to a letter of an AIDS patient who recovered by the method based on the pathocomplex process theory back in 1996.